Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/2034
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.other0000-0002-0225-8107es_ES
dc.contributor.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-8107-
dc.coverage.spatialAméricaes_ES
dc.creatorSuárez, Rafael-
dc.creatorArdelean, Ciprian Florin-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T20:19:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-27T20:19:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.identifier.isbn978-1607-8164-61es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn978-1607-8164-54es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/2034-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48779/scty-ph39-
dc.description.abstractIt is hard to identify another topic in world archaeology still as hot, controversial, mysterious, shifing, and continuously confictive as the Ice Age archaeology of Americas. For decades, passions have surged, egos have clashed, academic politics have boiled, and paradigms have risen and changed. Now, almost a century since the initial discoveries that began to challenge the thick ice of preconceptions, we are living in a new era of exciting fnds that show us that archaeological knowledge is never defnitive. America’s two hemispheres have lived these experiences in separate manners and from relatively divergent positions. To the north, the more homogenous Anglo world (principally, the United States) was long haunted by the conservative theories of single-route recent human arrival on the continent. Scholars developed a culture of caution and skepticism around the strongholds of tough paradigms such as Clovisfrst. To the south, the more rebel and eclectic Latin world traditionally stood apart from the northern postures and felt freer to sustain outof-the-box ideas, ofen constructed upon expedient conjectures, and frequently cemented by their own regional paradigms. Between the two, dialogue and constructive communication were not the rule, and the creation of models upon the particular archaeological records of the North and the South manifested as parallel, rarely compatible interpretations of the past.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherThe University of Utah Presses_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.classificationHUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS DE LA CONDUCTA [4]es_ES
dc.subject.otherpaleontologíaes_ES
dc.subject.otherera de hieloes_ES
dc.subject.othercontinente americanoes_ES
dc.titlePeople and culture in ace age Americas. New dimensions in Paleoamerican Archaeologyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookes_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Antropología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019 Ardelean people and culture in ice age.pdf3,69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons