Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/235
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.other0000-0002-7441-3233
dc.coverage.spatialGlobales_ES
dc.creatorFoladori, Guillermo
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T17:40:16Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T17:40:16Z
dc.date.issued2000-01
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn1666-485Xes_ES
dc.identifier.issn1668-723Xes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/235
dc.descriptionIt is argued in this paper that two general stances towards environmental education (EE) can be identified in the available literature. On the one hand, EE is conceived as an end in itself, and as an endeavour that has a wealth of content of its own —the ecology— that is able to transform unsatisfactory material conditions into less polluted and depleted environments. This stance equates EE with ecology learning and assumes the environmental problematic is a technical one. On the other hand, EE can be grounded in the idea that environmental problems rise from socio-economic structures rather than from technical issues; and that EE, in order to make sense, has to complement structural changes taking place within a society. This second stance identifies EE with education on how human society’s relationship with itself —economic, social, and political— determines its relationship with and appropriation of the material world and other living organisms. Thus, from this perspective —and as we argue in this paper— environmental problems are not technical but societal and, as we discuss, this has significant implications for education.es_ES
dc.description.abstractDurante las últimas tres décadas del siglo XX el concepto de educación ambiental (EA) ha te nido diferentes significados; sin embargo, más allá de que ha cambiado, lo que se entiende por EA pueden distinguirse dos grandes posturas. Por un lado, aquella que la considera como un objetivo en sí misma y has ta con un contenido propio —la ecología—,capaz de transformar las condiciones materiales hacia un ambiente menos contaminado y depredado. Esta postura equipara EA con enseñanza de la ecología, y asume los problemas ambientales como esencialmente técnicos. El desconocimiento de los flujos de energía y materiales entre la sociedad humana y el resto del mundo físico- material y los otros seres vivos es causante de la crisis ambiental. De allí que la EA se asuma como el instrumento para su solución.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherAcademia Nacional de Educación Ambientallllles_ES
dc.relationhttps://issuu.com/agoraambiental/docs/el_pensamiento_ambientalistaes_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceTópicos en Educación Ambiental, vol.2, No.1, pp. 21-38.es_ES
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS AGROPECUARIAS Y BIOTECNOLOGIA [6]es_ES
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Crisis ambiental
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Ecología
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Educación ambiental
dc.titleEl pensamiento ambientalistaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Estudios del Desarrollo

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Foladori, Guillermo. El Pensamiento Ambientalista.pdfVersión publicada149,61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons