Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/41
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor10070
dc.contributor122893
dc.coverage.spatialMéxicoes_ES
dc.creatorDelgado Wise, Raúl
dc.creatorCypher, James
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-12T19:48:46Z
dc.date.available2017-04-12T19:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2005-12-02
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/41
dc.description.abstractThere have been innumerable attempts to define and characterize the tendency toward accelerating internationalization (consisting of three simultaneous movements in the current era: rapidly expanding international trade, an explosive growth in international financial flows and activities, and one new element—the creation of globally integrated systems of production). This process of accelerating internationalization is sometimes understood to define “globalization”. Yet, globalization remains an elusive concept often capriciously defined and vaguely employed. Among other objectives, we seek to add some specificity to the process of accelerating internationalization through the examination of what could be considered a paradigmatic case: NAFTA, with particular reference to Mexico’s role in the transnational production system that NAFTA has created. We seek to illuminate in one important instance what has occurred as both the US and Mexico have exhibited a process of asymmetrical integration. This case analysis cannot seek to define “globalization”, least of all because it is an ideologically charged term. Nonetheless, the pathological process we explore below cannot be considered an aberration or an exception to the dynamics of internationalization (or “globalization”). Rather, we maintain, it is clearly derivative of, and a definitive negation of, the neoclassical/neoliberal percept that an indiscriminate opening between nations (or “free trade”) will generate significant mutual benefits for these nations (irrespective of their relative power, history, distinct productive apparatuses, relative level of development, etc.).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPrinceton Universityes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0002716206297527?journalCode=annaes_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceNafta and Beyons alternative disciplinary perspecives in the study gf global trade and development (Princeton University : December 2-3, 2005)es_ES
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS SOCIALES [5]es_ES
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Financial flows
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Internationalization
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Globalization
dc.subject.otherinfo:eu-repo/classification/Transnational production
dc.titleThe strategic role of labor in mexico´s subordinated integration into the u.s. production system under NAFTAes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectes_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Estudios del Desarrollo

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16378delgado-cypher-nov2005.pdfDraft version1,29 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons