Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/871
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor164375es_ES
dc.contributor.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-2736-
dc.coverage.spatialGlobales_ES
dc.creatorMuro Reyes, Alberto-
dc.creatorGutiérrez Bañuelos, Héctor-
dc.creatorDíaz García, Luis Humberto-
dc.creatorEscareño Sanchez, Luis Manuel-
dc.creatorBañuelos Valenzuela, Romulo-
dc.creatorMedina Flores, Carlos Aurelio-
dc.creatorCorral Luna, Agustin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T18:50:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-27T18:50:40Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.identifier.issn1680-5593es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/xmlui/handle/20.500.11845/871-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48779/shc7-bh95-
dc.descriptionResidual feed intake was evaluated as alternative strategy to decrease methane emissions from sheep. About 24 ewes (30±2 kg of BW) and 16 rams (32±2 kg of BW) were individually fed (42 days). Residual Feed Intake (RFI) was calculated for each individual by sex as the difference between actual and expected feed intake adjusted for metabolic body weight and gain weight rate. Animals were categorized (by sex and overall) as low (more efficient), medium and high RFI (less efficient). Methane emissions were estimated using gross energy intake (EF-CH4) and dry matter intake (EM-CTL,)-No effects (p> 0.05) were observed on initial or final body weight neither on average daily gain. Methane production (kg day-1) from low RFI ewes were lower (p< 0.01) beingO. 021 and 0.025 than for high RFI averaging 0.027 and 0.032, respectively for EF-CTPandEM-CFL Positive relationships were found in rams between …es_ES
dc.description.abstractResidual feed intake was evaluated as alternative strategy to decrease methane emissions from sheep. About 24 ewes (30±2 kg of BW) and 16 rams (32±2 kg of BW) were individually fed (42 days). Residual Feed Intake (RFI) was calculated for each individual by sex as the difference between actual and expected feed intake adjusted for metabolic body weight and gain weight rate. Animals were categorized (by sex and overall) as low (more efficient), medium and high RFI (less efficient). Methane emissions were estimated using gross energy intake (EF-CH4) and dry matter intake (EM-CTL,)-No effects (p> 0.05) were observed on initial or final body weight neither on average daily gain. Methane production (kg day-1) from low RFI ewes were lower (p< 0.01) beingO. 021 and 0.025 than for high RFI averaging 0.027 and 0.032, respectively for EF-CTPandEM-CFL Positive relationships were found in rams between …es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMedwell Journalses_ES
dc.relationhttp://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/javaa/2011/1551-1556.pdfes_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceJournal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, Vol. 10, No.12, pp. 1551-1556es_ES
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS AGROPECUARIAS Y BIOTECNOLOGIA [6]es_ES
dc.subject.otherMethanees_ES
dc.subject.otherresidual feed intakees_ES
dc.subject.othersheepes_ES
dc.subject.otherfeed efficiencyes_ES
dc.subject.otherparameterses_ES
dc.subject.otherramses_ES
dc.titlePotential environmental benefits of residual feed intake as strategy to mitigate methane emissions in sheepes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Veterinaría

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Muro Reyes et al 2011.pdf422,39 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons